[45]
A RANDOMIZED DOUBLE-BLIND SURVEY
ON THE EFFECT OF BRIVUDIN IN THE PREVENTION
OF POSTHERPETIC PAIN IN COMPARISON WITH ACYCLOVIR
*S.W. Wassilew (1), B.M. Stubinski (2), G. Stätdler
(2), I. Koch (2), K. Schumacher (2), A. Neubauer
(2), on behalf of the Collaborative Brivudin
PHN Study Group
Dermatologic Department, Klinikum Krefeld, Germany;
Berlin-Chemie / Menarini Group, Berlin, Germany
Study Objective:
To determine the efficacy of brivudin in the
prevention of postherpetic pain in comparison
with acyclovir.
Design:
Double-blind survey evaluating data obtained
from participants of a randomized herpes zoster
trial which compared the efficacy of brivudin
and acyclovir in acute herpes zoster. The survey
covered a period of 8 to 11 months after the
end of the herpes zoster trial.
Setting:
147 centers in 7 European countries.
Patients:
608 immunocompetent patients with herpes zoster,
aged 50 years or older. Baseline characteristics
were comparable in the two treatment groups.
Treatments:
Oral brivudin 125 mg once daily versus oral
acyclovir 800 mg five times daily, both for
7 days. Treatment started within 48 hours after
first vesicular eruption.
Main Results:
A total of 662 patients from the herpes zoster
trial were selected under double-blind conditions
to evaluate the incidence of postherpetic pain
after study termination (main selection criterion:
age > 50 years). Of these, 608 patients (brivudin:
309, acyclovir: 299) were willing to participate.
During the survey period, the incidence of postherpetic
pain was significantly lower after brivudin
therapy (32.7%) than after treatment with acyclovir
(43.5%, P=0.006). The prevalence of postherpetic
pain decreased steadily during the survey period,
with the difference between the treatment groups
remaining constantly in favor of brivudin [month
1: 28.3% (brivudin) vs. 38.5% (acyclovir); P=0.01,
month 2: 25.1% (brivudin) vs. 34.7% (acyclovir);
P=0.01, month 3: 19.1% (brivudin) vs. 26.7%
(acyclovir), P=0.03]. The duration of postherpetic
pain, measured by the median time from start
of treatment to resolution of pain, was comparable
in both treatment groups (brivudin: 119 days,
acyclovir: 116 days, RR: 1.11 CI: 0.93-1.32),
as was the maximum intensity of pain (mostly
1 = "mild" or 2 = "discomforting"
in a ranking scale from 0 = "no pain"
to 5 = "unbearable pain").
Conclusions:
Brivudin 125 mg once daily is significantly
more effective in the prevention of postherpetic
pain than standard acyclovir.
Corresponding Author: Prof. Dr.
S. W. Wassilew, Director of the Dermatologic
Department, Klinikum Krefeld, Lutherplatz 40,
47805 Krefeld, Germany